Legal Opinion

Gadson v. Newman

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 3, 1992No. 92-3047PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Presented here is a novel twist to the issue of whether physicians, lawyers and other professionals may be liable under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.

True, one does not ordinarily think of medical doctors in the business, of selling products that defraud consumers.

However, the' Illinois Consumer Fraud Act was amended to prohibit not only unfair competition, but any deceptive act or practice in the conduct of trade .or commerce.

Thus, the issue before the Court: whether the practice of medicine qualifies as trade or commerce for the purposes of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Darviris v. PetrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Barnett v. Mercy Health Partners-Lourdes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  3. Nelson v. HoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Bank One Milwaukee v. SanchezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API