Legal Opinion

Darviris v. Petros

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 9, 2004PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

May a patient who claims to be the victim of an unauthorized medical procedure bring an action against her physician for unfair or deceptive practices in violation of G. L. c. 93A? That is the central issue in this case commenced by Georgia Darviris and her husband against James G. Petros, a surgeon, who performed an excisional hemorrhoidectomy on Darviris without her consent, she alleges, and in violation of what has been termed the “patients’ bill of rights,” G. L. c. Ill, § 70E. Resolution of the question determines the outcome of the case because, as we shall explain, the remaining claims…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Baena v. KPMG LLPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Kraft Power Corp. v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Weinberg v. Grand Circle Travel, LCCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API