Legal Opinion

Bolding v. Camp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1927No. 2809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By agreement of all parties, the appellant has been permitted to file new briefs, and the case is now before us for determination upon the merits. The record contains no copy of any of the pleadings, and the controversy is submitted by a brief statement of the case under R.S. art. 2280. The substance of the statement is that the appellant Bolding was one of the defendants in a consolidated cause upon the docket of the district court of Wichita county. The court consolidated several cases, filed by different plaintiffs, against the same defendants, among them being W. P. Bolding, appellant, A.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hollister v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Randall, Sawyer & Dyer v. Merideth & AilmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolding v. CampTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. J. Robert Neal, Inc. v. McElveenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API