Legal Opinion

Hollister v. McCamey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1925No. 3829PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The single question in this case is whether the shareholders in the Hollister Oil Company, including plaintiffs in error, became liable for a debt incurred under a drilling contract between defendant in error and the Hollister Oil Company.

Under an agreed statement of facts, the liability of the shareholders was made to depend on whether, as a matter of law, a certain writing, copied on pages 691 to 694 in Volume 241 of the Southwestern Reporter, under which the Oil Company was doing business, created a joint stock company or a common law trust, and, if it created the former, whether it made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Neville v. GiffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Graham Hotel Corp. v. LeaderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Morehead v. Greenville Exch. Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. HaralsonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Weber Engine Co. v. AlterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Clark v. WisdomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Ex Parte Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API