Legal Opinion

Glaze v. Fulton National Bank of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1966No. 42184PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

1. “Where in an answer by paragraphs to a petition bringing suit on a promissory note, a defendant makes in answer to one paragraph a general denial of the indebtedness as alleged in the petition, and such answer nowhere sets up any legal defense, such denial is in effect a plea of the general issue.” Kingery v. Yancey Bros. Co., 100 Ga. App. 178, 180 (110 SE2d 411) and citations. “This general denial (as against an unconditional contract in writing, and in the absence of a plea of non est factum) amounts to no plea at all, so far as indebtedness is concerned.” Medlock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finney v. CadwalladerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Hicks v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Medlock v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Kreischer v. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Kingery v. Yancey Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. McInvale v. Walter E. Heller & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Free for all Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Godfrey v. Farm & Resort Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API