Hudgins v. Pure Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
1. In this suit on a note, defendant simply denied the paragraph of plaintiff’s petition which included the note and alleged the indebtedness. This denial was in effect a plea of the general issue, and as against an unconditional contract in writing, was insufficient as a defense against recovery for the principal and interest on the note. Kingery v. Yancey Bros. Co., 100 Ga. App. 178, 180 (110 SE2d 411); Medlock v. Wood, 4 Ga. App. 368, 369 (61 SE 516); Wood v. Noland Credit Co., 113 Ga. App. 749 (2) (149 SE2d 720). However, in another paragraph of his answer defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hicks v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Cherry v. McCutchenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Medlock v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Kreischer v. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Kingery v. Yancey Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marler v. Citizens & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Gooden v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Gregson & Associates, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Tolbert v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Gooden v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.