Legal Opinion

Hudgins v. Pure Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1967No. 42471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

1. In this suit on a note, defendant simply denied the paragraph of plaintiff’s petition which included the note and alleged the indebtedness. This denial was in effect a plea of the general issue, and as against an unconditional contract in writing, was insufficient as a defense against recovery for the principal and interest on the note. Kingery v. Yancey Bros. Co., 100 Ga. App. 178, 180 (110 SE2d 411); Medlock v. Wood, 4 Ga. App. 368, 369 (61 SE 516); Wood v. Noland Credit Co., 113 Ga. App. 749 (2) (149 SE2d 720). However, in another paragraph of his answer defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Cherry v. McCutchenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Medlock v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Kreischer v. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Kingery v. Yancey Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marler v. Citizens & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Gooden v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Gregson & Associates, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Tolbert v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Gooden v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API