Kreischer v. Bank of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. An allegation in the petition in a suit upon a promissory note, that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on the note, which purports to be indorsed in blank by the payee, is an allegation to the effect that the plaintiff is the holder of the legal title to the note. Parker-McCaskill Furniture Co. v. Saint Pasteur, 29 Ga. App. 86 (113 S. E. 817).
2. An allegation that on a note payable to Sam M. Clark the indorser is Sam W. Clark may be amended by striking the allegation that Sam W. Clark is the indorser, and substituting an allegation that Sam M. Clark is the indorser.
3. In a suit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Mendel v. Miller & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Connor v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Huger v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Medlock v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Kingery v. Yancey Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Austell Bank v. National Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hudgins v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.