Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1907No. 602PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Complaint,. from city court of Sylvester — Judge Park. May 28, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

There can be no doubt1 that the rulings of the court were right, except in striking defendant’s plea. Plaintiff filed a complaint in short form, on two acceptances. Defendant demurred. Plaintiff amended. Demurrer overruled. Defendant pleaded. Plea stricken. . No evidence. Judgment for plaintiff. The rencounter was brief, the result decisive. This is the story of. the action, told by the record, as it appears in black and white. We know not (for upon this the record does not speak), how lengthy the war of words, how deep the delving for authorities, how loud the thunder of oratory, nor how.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. May v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Bond v. Central BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Warren v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Finney v. CadwalladerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Busby v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. John Church Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. McCullough v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Home Insurance v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. The State v. HassonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API