Ford v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Certiorari to review an award made to T. B. Cowan by the Industrial Accident Commission pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 831).
Petitioner owned several storerooms and flats which he kept in repair and let to tenants. Other than this, he was engaged in no business, trade, or occupation. He employed Cowan at $3.50 per day to do the work required in hanging paper and tinting the walls of the rooms in one of the flats. While so engaged his attention was directed to a leaky toilet in the building, which petitioner told him to repair, and while so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Blood v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Lauzier v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ingram v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Edwards v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Sink v. PharaohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Sommerville v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.