Legal Opinion

Sommerville v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1948No. 7111PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Review of an order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying compensation to plaintiff for injuries sustained by him while doing repair work on a building owned by defendant Cook. The sole question for our determination is whether plaintiff was an employee within the regular course of defendant Ina Cook’s trade, profession, business, or occupation, or whether he was an independent contractor or casual employee and hence not within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The commission denied compensation on the grounds that plaintiff was a “casual employee” at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Holmen Creamery Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Stover Bedding Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Setter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Christean v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rustler Lodge v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Utah Home Fire Insurance Co. v. ManningUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sutton v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API