Roberts v. Saukville Canning Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
A claim of conspiracy is a, challenging allegation, but in a civil action unless the conspiracy is established by clear and convincing evidence and some act pursuant to a formed conspiracy causing damage is proven, no cause of action exists. 11 Am. Jur., Conspiracy, p. 577, sec. 45. The defendant has attempted to maintain the cause set forth in its counterclaim. The circuit court, under testimony to be referred to, ruled that Roberts, the plaintiff, “instigated and participated” in conduct on the part of directors of the Sauk-ville Canning Company (Pugh, Gross, and Babcock) which amounted to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Glenwood Manufacturing Co. v. SymeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Shinners v. GrossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Gauger v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Colorado Management Corp. v. American Founders Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- American Motors Corp. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974