Legal Opinion

Howard Entertainment, Inc. v. Kudrow

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 2012No. B234962PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1105Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Scott Howard (Howard), a personal manager, entered into an oral agreement with defendant and respondent Lisa Kudrow (Kudrow), an entertainer, by which agreement he would receive for personal management services a percentage of Kudrow’s income.1 After Kudrow terminated Howard’s services, he claimed that he should continue to receive a percentage of Kudrow’s income from Kudrow’s engagements entered into, or from services rendered, during the period of his retention. Howard relied upon custom and usage in the industry to support his claim. In…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brown v. Goldstein, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. In re ABM Indus. Overtime Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. O'Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Winternitz v. Winternitz CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Roscoe Littlefield v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API