State v. Turner
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The. defendant, Tyson Turner, challenges his conviction of the crime of felon in possession of a firearm. See Iowa Code § 724.26 (1997). He claims the court erred in admitting inculpatory statements he made prior to being given Miranda warnings. The State contends Miranda warnings were not required at the time Turner made the statements because Turner was not in custody and the statements were volunteered.
In our de novo review, we conclude that Miranda warnings were required and any incriminating statements made by Turner should have been suppressed. Therefore, we reverse the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. TagueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.