Legal Opinion

State v. Sexsmith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of manslaughter. A demurrer to the indictment was overruled, and on a trial the defendant was convicted. The conviction was reversed by this court for error in overruling the demurrer. State v. Sexsmith, 200 Iowa 1244. Upon the remand of the case to the district court, the demurrer was sustained. The order of the court entered at that time was as follows:

‘‘Now on this day this cause came on for hearing on demurrer of the defendant to the indictment, and the same is heard and sustained by the court, pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. People v. BissertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ex Parte HayterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HartungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. State v. TalericoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. State v. BuckleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. State v. HiattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. State v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API