Legal Opinion
L-3 Communications Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 20, 2011No. 10-538CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Pending before the Court are plaintiffs, defendant’s, and intervenor’s motions for judgment on the administrative record, filed pursuant to Rule 62.1(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons that follow, defendant’s and intervenor’s motions are GRANTED and plaintiffs motion is DENIED.1
I. BACKGROUND
This ease deals with one portion of a $1,678 billion foreign military sale (“FMS”) of F-16s and related services to Egypt. At issue here is the procurement of flight simulators to train Egyptian pilots on use of the new…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Cw Government Travel, Inc., D/B/A Cwtsatotravel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- The McVey Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.