Legal Opinion

State v. Mauro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 20, 1988No. 10-85-09703; CA A41727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

The state appeals defendant’s judgment for indemnity, ORS 33.110, which the court granted after it held the state in contempt for wilful violation of its order to return defendant’s car and scale. The state assigns as errors that the court found that the state was in wilful contempt and awarded judgment to defendant. We reverse.

On July 30,1985, Eugene police searched defendant’s home pursuant to a warrant and seized several items, including a scale. Defendant was indicted for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), and unlawful possession of a weapon. ORS 166.250. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. O'MALLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. O'MalleyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Strain v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. In re the Marriage of WyllieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State ex rel. United Financial Systems, Inc. v. HolstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API