Keyser v. Sutherland
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action of ejectment, to recover a. piece of land which lies on the west side of the S. W. £ of the N. W. £ of section 29, in town 2 S., of range 11 W. Said piece of land is bounded on the west, by the section line which runs on the east of section 30, and on the east, by what is claimed to be the west line of an Indian reserve.
The plaintiff holds the title, without dispute, of the said S. W. £ of the N. W. £ of section 29, as patented from the government, and claims that this strip of land is contained within that description.
The defendant claims his title under a patent from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Miller v. KerrSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Lessee of William L. Brown and Wife, in Error v. Joseph Clements and Jonathan Hunt, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Parker v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Moran v. LezotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co. v. South Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Vaught v. McClymondMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Fahey v. CrottyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Whitney v. Detroit Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- McKinnon v. MestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.