Fahey v. Crotty
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error.’ The facts are-stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The declaration in this cause is trespass on. the case for assault and battery. The plea was the general issue. The defendant recovered judgment in the court below, and plaintiff brings error.
The plaintiff’s father and the defendant owned adjoining lots in the city of Detroit, and a dispute arose over the location of the line fence between them, which resulted in an effort of each of them to build a line fence upon what each considered the line. Plaintiff gave evidence tending to prove-that her father was removing dirt from one of the post-holes that thereupon the defendant struck her father…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Corning v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Goldsmith, Forcheimer & Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Humphrey v. HumphreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Ruan v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Gutzwiller v. LackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McNabb v. Green Real Estate Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Robinson v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Kornec v. Mike Horse Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
- Williams v. EdmundsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Baumier v. AntiauMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.