Legal Opinion

Vaught v. McClymond

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1945No. 8453PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adair

This action involves a boundary line between the lands of the plaintiff and those of the defendant and cross-complainant in section 26, township 4 south, range 24 east, M. P. M. Carbon county.

Plaintiff, Dorothy Vaught, is the owner of the north half of the southwest quarter and the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter and cross-complainant, J. E. McClymond, is owner of the northwest quarter of section 26. The boundary line in dispute is the dividing line between the two quarters. The parties admit that plaintiff owns no part of the northwest quarter and that cross-complainant owns no…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Billings v. Pierce Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Robbins v. County of BlaineIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API