Legal Opinion
Josephson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 15, 1963No. Civ. 27302PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner, Samuel Josephson, seeks a writ of mandate pursuant to section 416.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure requiring respondent court to issue an order quashing the service of summons on the ground that the court did not acquire in personam jurisdiction as the result of service of process on him outside the State of California.
On June 14, 1962, an action upon a promissory note was filed by one Nana Maxtow, naming as defendants the petitioner herein and Harry Pinch, real party in interest herein. Petitioner has not been served as such defendant. Pinch filed his answer to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. KrivdaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Clausing v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Sawyer v. First City Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Reisman v. ShahverdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.