Schmid v. Village of Frankfort
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Benzie; Chittenden, J. Assumpsit by Frederick Schmid, surviving partner of the firm of Mack & Schmid, against the village of Frankfort, upon municipal bonds. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
A review of a former trial of this cause will be found in 131 Mich. 197 (91 N. W. 131), where the facts are stated. It has been tried a second time, and a verdict for the defendant was followed by judgment, and the plaintiff has again brought error. The points now raised relate to the question of plaintiff’s bona fides in the purchase of the bonds.
The proof upon the later trial was much the same as upon the former; the only substantial difference being that it was shown upon the later trial that the plaintiff and his copartner had before them upon the day that the bonds were purchased the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Davis v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Plunkett v. Detroit Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Village of Frankfort v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Village of Frankfort v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1909