Plunkett v. Detroit Electric Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Case by Matthew Plunkett against the Detroit Electric Railway Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff, a city fireman, was pipe-man on a hose truck, which was proceeding west on High street at 7:45 p. m., February 2, 1900, when it was struck at Hastings street by a north-bound Hastings-street car belonging to defendant. Plaintiff was thrown and injured. Plaintiff brought this action to recover for the injuries sustained, and on the trial, under a charge submitting the question of defendant’s negligence, and that of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, to the jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $2,500.
Defendant thereupon entered a motion for judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Gesualdi v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Q. R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1915
- Prowell v. NeuendorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1905