Village of Frankfort v. Schmid
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Benzie; Chittenden, J. Bill by the village of Frankfort against Frederick Schmid, surviving partner of Mack & Schmid, to enjoin the negotiation of certain bonds, and for the surrender and cancellation of the same. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill to determine the legality of said bonds, and a decree for their payment. From a decree for complainant, and dismissing defendant’s cross-bill, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
“Defendant is survivor of himself and Christian Mack, copartners, who resided and carried on their business at Ann Arbor. On June 5, 1895, defendant’s firm purchased three certain bonds, issued by complainant village, of $1,000 each, dated February 27, 1895, payable in 10 years, with interest at 6 per cent, payable annually. Ten interest coupons of $60 each were attached to each bond. These bonds were apparently valid, and purported to be issued for park purposes. They were sold and delivered to defendant’s firm by E. R. Chandler, a banker of the village of Frankfort, who acted as agent for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mack v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Schmid v. Benzie Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grabill v. Barnhart Bros. & SpindlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910