Dow Chemical Co. v. Mahlum
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
970 P.2d 98 (1998)
The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Respondent,
v.
Charlotte MAHLUM and Marvin S. Mahlum, Respondents/Cross-Appellants.
No. 28600.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
December 31, 1998.
Rawlings Olson Cannon Gormley & Desruisseaux, Las Vegas; McDonald, Carano, Wilson, McCune, Bergin, Frankovich & Hicks, Reno; Mayer, Brown & Platt and Michele Louise Odorizzi, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
White & Meany, Reno; Ellis & Rapacki, Boston, Massachusetts; Farmer, Price, Hornsby & Weatherford, Dothan, Alabama, for Respondents/Cross-Appellants.
Thomas J. Hall, Reno; Robin S.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Springer; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Maupin; Concurrence.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. Hart's Food Stores, Inc. And Starhart Bakeries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.