Legal Opinion

Pieper v. Musarra

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1998No. S-7636PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court dissolved the partnership that Julia Pieper and Ann Van Dorn Musarra formed to run a recreational vehicle (RV) park. Pieper raises numerous claims of error, attacking every superior court finding of fact and conclusion of law. With one exception, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Pieper and Musarra agreed to jointly develop and operate an RV park on property they had acquired near Ninilchik. They opened the park in the summer of 1991 after developing the property. According to the partnership’s tax returns, the park lost money every…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Croft v. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Hydaburg v. Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pullen v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fyffe v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Greenway v. HeathcottAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Duffus v. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API