Pullen v. Ulmer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pullen and United Fishermen of Alaska, Inc. challenge an initiative designed to set priorities among different salmon harvest users.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In August of 1995, Appellee Fairness in Salmon Harvest, Inc. (F.I.S.H.) submitted an initiative application to the state.1 The proposed initiative provided that subsistence, personal use, and sport fisheries would receive a preference to take a portion of the salmon harvest before the remaining harvest-able salmon are allocated to other harvest users. The proposed initiative also sets a limit on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brooks v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. ParnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Mesiar v. HeckmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.