Croft v. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal presents the issue of whether an employer is entitled to be reimbursed for attorney’s fees paid to the employee’s attorney during pendency of a workers’ compensation appeal which was ultimately resolved in favor of the employer. We hold that the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) does not permit an employer to recoup payments made to claimants or their attorneys except by withholding future payments under AS 23.30.-155®.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are not in dispute. The controversy arises from our decision barring Damon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Puller v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Braun Baking Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Wise Mechanical Contractors v. BignellAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Childs v. Copper Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hamilton v. BlackmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.