Legal Opinion

Joel Marvin Munt v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2016No. A15-1597PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Joel Marvin Munt appeals from the summary denial of his petition for postconviction relief, filed under MinmStat. § 590.01, subd. 1 (2014). The postconviction court concluded that Munt’s petition was untimely and, in any case, meritless. Because the record conclusively establishes that Munt’s postconviction claims are either procedurally barred or merit-less, we affirm..

Following a bifurcated jury trial, the district court convicted Munt of multiple counts, including first-degree murder, arising out of the shooting death of his former wife and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State of Minnesota v. Marlon Rashaad RobertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Munt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Crow v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Joel Marvin Munt, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API