Legal Opinion
Vander Eyk v. Bones
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1958No. 9703-aPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMPERT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a sale of a bull and recover $800, the amount of the purchase price of the bull, and $200 to cover damages done to the plaintiff as a result of the fact that cows were not bred at the proper time by reason of the breach of an express warranty.
The case was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment was entered for the defendant; from this judgment plaintiff appeals. ■
The plaintiff is a farmer seventy-six years of age who came to the United States when he was thirty-five years of age, and lives at Milbank, South Dakota. He has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Dowlen v. FitchTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- W. S. Maxwell Co. v. Southern Oregon Gas Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Trimount Lumber Co. v. MurdoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Opp v. NieuwsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2000
- Adler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.