Legal Opinion
Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 26, 2000No. Civ 97-4243PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
The defendants, Amoco Chemical Company and Amoco Reinforced Plastics Company (ARPCO), have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the Merits of the Complaint filed against them by the plaintiffs, Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. and the City of Brookings, South Dakota. After the Court’s previous Memorandum Opinion and Order on the Motion for Summary Judgment, defendants’ filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- McCoy v. MacOn Water AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Newport Electronics, Inc. v. Newport Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.