Moser v. Frohnmayer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of ORS 759.290. He appeals from a summary judgment for defendants. We reverse.
Plaintiff is a chimney sweep who uses a ‘ ‘telemarketing computer” to advertise his service. The computer automatically and systematically dials telephone numbers in plaintiffs service area. When it connects with someone who answers “hello,” it plays a recorded message concerning plaintiffs business. ORS 759.290 provides:
“(1) No person shall use an automatic dialing and announcing device to solicit the purchase of any realty, goods…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moser v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Eugene v. PowlowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- City of Eugene v. PowlowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Moser v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1993