Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Fadeley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1990No. 89-13; SC S37022PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

This is. a case of mandatory review pursuant to ORS 1.430(1) of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability (the Commission)1 recommending that the Accused, the Honorable Edward N. Fadeley, an Associate Justice of this court, be censured for wilful violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Accused admits the violations of the Code of which he is accused, but he argues that, for various statutory and constitutional reasons, he may not be disciplined for the conduct in question. We do not find any of the Accused’s statutory…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Williams-Yulee v. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StonemanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Moser v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1993

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API