Moser v. Frohnmayer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*374PETERSON, J.
Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, provides that “[n]o law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print freely on any subject whatever.” The issue in this case is whether a law that prohibits the use of any “automatic dialing and announcing device to solicit the purchase of any realty, goods or services,” ORS 759.290, violates Article I, section 8.
Plaintiff operates a chimney sweep business. He uses an automatic dialing and announcing device to solicit customers. He brought this action seeking a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Valentine v. ChrestensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Richard T. Van Bergen v. State of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Eugene v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.