Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moser v. Frohnmayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1993No. CC 89C-12416; CA A67796; SC S39367Published

1Opinion of the Court

845 P.2d 1284 (1993)

315 Or. 372

Ronald MOSER, Respondent on Review,

v.

David B. FROHNMAYER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, and the State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review.

CC 89C-12416; CA A67796; SC S39367.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted November 2, 1992.

Decided February 19, 1993.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Valentine v. ChrestensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API