United States v. Armando Antonio Castro
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
This appeal presents the issue whether Armando Antonio Castro is entitled to va-catur of his guilty plea on the ground that the district court committed plain error, in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1), by advising Castro about the penal consequences of rejecting his written plea agreement. Castro entered a written agreement with the United States to plead guilty to several counts of his indictment, but Castro renounced his agreement on the morning of his change of plea hearing. After the district court advised Castro that, “if you don’t plead…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Oluwaseun SanyaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Anthony DavilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Daniel Ushery, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Fred ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Derrick Harrell, Corwin DantzleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.