United States v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Vladimir Rodriguez appeals his 109-month sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 3, 4-methylenedi-oxymethamphetamine (“MDMA”), also known as ecstasy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(C) and 846, and possession with intent to distribute MDMA, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Rodriguez argues that the district court’s calculation of the amount of MDMA attributable to him in determining his base offense level, pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“guidelines”), was not supported by the evidence.
Rodriguez…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by650 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
645 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.