Legal Opinion

Bonicamp, Koelling & Smith v. McNeely

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1963No. 43,127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

Plaintiffs (appellees) Bonicamp, Koelling and Smith, a partnership, engaged in the business of certified public accounting, brought this action to recover on an account for services rendered by them to defendant (appellant) R. B. McNeely.

The original petition filed July 12, 1960, sought to recover $2,802.50 due on an itemized account attached to the petition, to which petition the court sustained defendant’s motion to make definite and certain and overruled defendant’s motion to strike certain portions of the petition. In compliance with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Freeland v. Heron, Lenox & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1812
  3. Powell v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Fernández Martínez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964
  3. Linsenmeyer v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Quincy Lumber Co. v. SaiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Continental American Corp. v. Pacific Balloon Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API