Legal Opinion

Bober v. New Mexico State Fair

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1991No. 18987PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

On this appeal we consider again whether a landowner’s duty to avoid creating or permitting an unsafe condition or activity on the premises is limited by the physical boundaries of the land. In Mitchell v. C & H Transportation Co., 90 N.M. 471, 565 P.2d 342 (1977), and recently in Calkins v. Cox Estates, 110 N.M. 59, 792 P.2d 36 (1990), we ruled that the landowner’s duty is not so limited and that the owner (or other occupier or possessor) may be held liable for injuries sustained by someone beyond the boundaries of the land if those injuries proximately result from…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Schear v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality PontiacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  3. Glover v. GartmanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  4. Dunleavy v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Archibeque v. MoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API