Legal Opinion

State v. Simon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 2012No. 2 CA-SA 2011-0098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s orders precluding the state from introducing the results of blood tests as evidence in its prosecutions of the real parties in interest. For the reasons stated below, we accept jurisdiction of this special action in part and grant the state partial relief.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 Each of the real parties in interest here was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) while impaired to the slightest degree pursuant to AR.S. § 28-1381(A)(1). Blood samples were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cronin v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API