Legal Opinion
Kapuschinsky v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 4, 1966No. Civ. A. 7646PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Before the court is the remaining issue of damages; if due, in what compensatory amount; if not due, the reasons therefor. Previous findings favored plaintiff on the issue of liability. Kapuschinsky v. United States, 248 F.Supp. 732 (D.S.C.1966).
Feeling the necessity of supplementing the evidence previously admitted at trial this court directed further examination and additional arguments on the issue of damages.
It was developed that plaintiff had undergone three additional operations and it was agreed that she would be reexamined and testimony was taken on April 21,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Broadway Photoplay Co. v. . World Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Tucker v. Buffalo Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Watson v. Wilkinson Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Ford v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haselden v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- McNeill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Kishore v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.