Legal Opinion

Haselden v. Davis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 2003No. 25613PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Haselden v. Davis, 341 S.C. 486, 534 S.E.2d 295 (Ct.App.2000). We affirm.

FACTS

These are wrongful death and survival actions brought by the estate of Carolyn Hill (Hill), who died of breast cancer in 1994. The complaints alleged her treating physician, Petition er S. Perry Davis, M.D. (Davis), was negligent in failing to timely read a suspicious mammogram, which had been performed on Hill in November 1991. As a result, Hill’s breast cancer was not diagnosed until June 1993, by which time it had metastasized into her…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Cates v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Brandon HMA, Inc. v. BradshawMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gordon v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bynum v. MagnoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  5. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API