People v. Weaver
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McMAHON, J.
Respondents were charged with violating section 1603 of the Fish and Game Code. The second amended complaint specifically alleged that between February 4, 1982, and March 8, 1983, respondents “did substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel, or bank of the Tajigas Creek.” Respondents demurred on the ground that this language, taken from the language of the statute, was vague. This particular demurrer, was finally sustained without leave to amend and the People appeal from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.
Introduction
The reader…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Weaver v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.