Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Murphy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1996No. Civil 960036PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

This is a dispute over a contract requiring Hugh Redmond (Red) Murphy, now deceased, to pay his uncle, Pat Murphy, $300 per month for Pat’s life. After a bench trial, the district court found: 1) Red Murphy’s estate was liable for $300-per-month payments to Pat; 2) Pat Murphy was entitled to the amount Red’s estate was in arrears; and 3) Pat Murphy was entitled to attorney’s fees. The estate of Red Murphy appeals the judgment, claiming it did not receive a fair hearing because the trial court failed to rule on the motion for guardian ad litem and the motion for joinder…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Iowa Bridge Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Knudson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Murphy v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Estate of Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Goodleft v. GullicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API