Legal Opinion
Healy v. Healy
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1986No. Civ. 11101PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Rebecca Deanne Healy appeals from an amended judgment allowing Kirk Alan Healy expanded visitation with the child of the divorced couple. Rebecca asserts that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of proof and erred in admitting the results of a polygraph test of Kirk. She also challenges the trial court’s appointment of a guardian ad litem for the child and its order requiring the parties to obtain counseling. Kirk cross-appeals, claiming the court erred in not awarding him disbursements under § 28-26-06, N.D.C.C. We affirm.
Rebecca and Kirk were divorced in Kansas…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Robert J. Brown v. John F. Darcy, A/K/A Jack Darcy, an Individual Ducommun, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- State v. PuschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Gardebring v. RizzoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Reinecke v. GriffethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Johnson v. SchlotmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NewnamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.