Legal Opinion

Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2013No. 20130003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Earl and Harold Van Sickle (“Van Sickles”) appeal and Hallmark & Associ ates, Inc., Frank Celeste, William R. Austin, Phoenix Energy, Bobby Lankford, and Earskine Williams (“Interest Holders”), and Missouri Breaks, LLC, cross-appeal from an amended judgment holding Missouri Breaks liable to the Van Sickles for unpaid pre-bankruptcy confirmation royalties and awarding the Van Sickles interest and attorney’s fees. We conclude the court did not err in holding Missouri Breaks liable under state law for pre-bank-ruptcy confirmation royalties owed to the Van Sickles. We…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In Re Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo, Debtors. Elfriede Di Pierro v. Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo and Richard J. McCord Interim TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Reliable Electric Co., Inc. v. Olson Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Flaten v. CoutureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kittleson v. Grynberg Petroleum CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Edison v. EdisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. GanskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Powell v. Statoil Oil & GasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API