Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Reading Street Railway Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, No. 55PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Boss, J.,

This action of trespass arose out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff and a bus of the defendant Beading Street Railway Company. After a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. After the lower court refused both motions, the defendant took this appeal.

Following the well-established principle that the one in whose favor the jury has found is entitled to have the evidence supporting his verdict considered and all the rest rejected, and that he is entitled to a review of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freedman v. ZiccardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Dixon v. PentonySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Kaiser Co. v. American Individual Laundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Harnly v. IsaacmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ksiazek v. PelleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Klatt v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Weigel v. KravitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Gerisch v. McElhoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Scully v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API