Legal Opinion

Scully v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 15738Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

The jury was unable to agree on a verdict at the trial of this case and defendant has filed a motion for entry of judgment in his favor under Rule 50 (b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C., on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Whether the plaintiff was, or was not, contributorily negligent as a matter of law under the Pennsylvania decisions is a very close question on the facts of this case. The trial judge pointed out the apparent difficulty of plaintiff’s position at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case when defendant’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Kline v. KachmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Jaski v. West Park Daily Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Pellegrini v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API