Harnly v. Isaacman

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This judgment cannot be sustained.

According to plaintiff’s own story, when he, traveling east on Arch Street, passed the houseline of Mil-lick Street the defendant’s coal truck coming north on his right was thirteen feet distant from Arch Street. Plaintiff was traveling 18 to 20 miles an hour; defendant’s truck 25 to 30 miles an hour. They were approaching the intersection at substantially the same time. The defendant had the right of way : Act of April 27, 1925, P. L. 254, 279. It was plaintiff’s duty to stop and let the car coming from his right pass unless he was so…