Weigel v. Kravitz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
This is an appeal by defendant from the refusal of the Court below to enter judgment n.o.v. after a verdict in favor of plaintiff in a trespass action for property damage resulting from the collision of two trucks at a right angle street intersection in the City of Philadelphia. It is our duty to review the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff, resolving all conflicts ■in his favor, and giving him the benefit of every fact and inference of fact reasonably to be deduced from the evidence: McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil and Equipment Co., 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 308,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Armstrong v. Reading Street Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Klatt v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCune v. EllenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Todd v. TalattaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963