Legal Opinion

Weigel v. Kravitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, No. 108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from the refusal of the Court below to enter judgment n.o.v. after a verdict in favor of plaintiff in a trespass action for property damage resulting from the collision of two trucks at a right angle street intersection in the City of Philadelphia. It is our duty to review the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff, resolving all conflicts ■in his favor, and giving him the benefit of every fact and inference of fact reasonably to be deduced from the evidence: McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil and Equipment Co., 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 308,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Armstrong v. Reading Street Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Klatt v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCune v. EllenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Todd v. TalattaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API