State v. Monk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
By his sixth assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in its denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence. It is well-established that in reviewing the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment as of non-suit, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and determine whether it is sufficient to find that the crime charged in the indictment has been committed *340and that the defendant committed it. State v. Price, 280 N.C. 154, 184 S.E. 2d 866 (1971).
Viewed in this light, we think that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. CanipeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983